Hey there!

It looks like you're enjoying Pattaya-Revealed.com but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members and much more. Register now!

Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

Reply
 
Thread ToolsSpacer Display Modes Spacer
Old 08-21-2015, 07:17 PM   #1
Frankie

Advanced Member
 
Join Date:
Aug 2008
Posts:
2,276
Shouts:
9
Thanks:
7,746

Rep Power:
Frankie is on a distinguished road
Default

Aussies dominating at the end of Day 2. Can England avoid the follow on? They would have by now if all of Mitchell Johnson’s No Balls had been called.

Seriously WTF is going on with No Balls? Seems Bowlers are only referred for a check for overstepping when a wicket falls. The rest of the time Bowlers can do as they please bowling from 20 yards without feeling restricted.
Frankie is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frankie For This Useful Post:
bazzap (08-21-2015), Jake (09-07-2015)
Old 09-05-2015, 06:37 PM   #2
Frankie

Advanced Member
 
Join Date:
Aug 2008
Posts:
2,276
Shouts:
9
Thanks:
7,746

Rep Power:
Frankie is on a distinguished road
Default

I see the convicts have tarnished the game of cricket yet again appealing for Ben Stokes to be given out for Obstructing the Field, with the appeal being upheld by the Third Umpire. Disgraceful almost woke some of the MCC members up from their gin and champagne soaked slumbers.

Interestingly Stokes is the first Englishman to be given out in this way. The other cricketers comprise of One Indian with all the rest being Pakistani. Speaks volumes.

FWIW I have no idea what Stokes was trying to do, in fact he almost caught the ball as his hand was cupped but thought better of it. Still you can’t miss a chance to have a dig at the Aussies.
Frankie is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frankie For This Useful Post:
gonzo (09-05-2015)
Old 09-05-2015, 07:51 PM   #3
gonzo

Libertine
 
gonzo's Avatar
 
Join Date:
Dec 2006
Posts:
9,288
Shouts:
10830
Thanks:
9,013

Rep Power:
gonzo is on a distinguished road
Default

When the ball is coming at you at pace it's pretty natural to get your hand to it to protect yourself.
__________________
Send lawyers, guns and money.....
gonzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2015, 08:01 PM   #4
WankingWodger

Super Moderator
 
WankingWodger's Avatar
 
Join Date:
Dec 2006
Posts:
1,786
Shouts:
37
Thanks:
1,311

Rep Power:
WankingWodger is on a distinguished road
Default

What a disgrace to far play and sportsmanship. Fuck off Aussies if that is the only way to win.
__________________
AFKA ROLAND
WankingWodger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2015, 11:00 PM   #5
kuranda_bagman

Advanced Member
 
kuranda_bagman's Avatar
 
Join Date:
Apr 2007
Location:
Nth Qld, Australia
Posts:
1,964
Shouts:
460
Thanks:
11,968

Rep Power:
kuranda_bagman is on a distinguished road
Default

Lack of premeditation doesn't excuse the act

By the laws, there was every reason to give Stokes out.

The wording is that a batsman must wilfully interfere with a fielder's work by word or deed, and representations for Stokes centred around the word "wilful". If it was a flinch response, how could that apply?

But on the replay, Stokes reached his hand well outside the line of his body and hit the ball away from the stumps. The ball wasn't aimed at him and wasn't going to hit him.

Stokes is a left-handed batsman. He played the drive down the pitch, then took a couple of steps while expecting that it would beat the bowler. Once it didn't, he urgently needed to get back.

He began to turn towards his right, with the bat handle held in his right hand. The throw was also going past his right hand.

At that point, while turning, Stokes reached his left hand all the way across his body, and extended his arm nearly full length. The ball hit his palm, given by this stage Stokes almost had his back to the bowler.

He was looking back towards Starc until shortly before impact.

This was not the act of someone reflexively protecting his body, it was the act of someone reflexively intercepting the ball.

There's every likelihood that the action was instinctive, and it certainly had no time to be premeditated, but that doesn't change its effect or its intent.
__________________
"Dare your genius to grab the dream"
kuranda_bagman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2015, 11:07 PM   #6
kuranda_bagman

Advanced Member
 
kuranda_bagman's Avatar
 
Join Date:
Apr 2007
Location:
Nth Qld, Australia
Posts:
1,964
Shouts:
460
Thanks:
11,968

Rep Power:
kuranda_bagman is on a distinguished road
Default

Here's the video

http://zippy.gfycat.com/GorgeousResp...Blackbird.webm
__________________
"Dare your genius to grab the dream"
kuranda_bagman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kuranda_bagman For This Useful Post:
Jake (09-07-2015)
Old 09-06-2015, 02:03 AM   #7
bazzap

Super Moderator
 
bazzap's Avatar
 
Join Date:
Dec 2006
Posts:
9,320
Shouts:
5789
Thanks:
11,375

Rep Power:
bazzap is on a distinguished road
Default

Exactly right John


Pretty obvious why he was given out.

Typical Poms. They invented the game and its rules and when the rules go against them, its bad sportsmanship by the opposition.










If ever England were going to win a one day series against Australia, this was their big chance. Coming off an Ashes series win and top performances against the Kiwis, they should have been full of confidence.


Johnson, Hazlewood, Finch, Faulkner from the WC winning side six months ago are not there. Clarke and Haddin retired as well. In this game, Warner took no part and Watson could not bowl.



And yet, the Aussies continue to win. The machine marches on.





__________________
It's All About The Light
bazzap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2015, 03:31 AM   #8
ferocious

Northern monkey
 
ferocious's Avatar
 
Join Date:
Dec 2006
Location:
Down south
Posts:
8,417
Shouts:
18219
Thanks:
10,868

Rep Power:
ferocious is on a distinguished road
Default

fair enough if the on field umpire had given it out it was the fact the Aussies went crying with a review
__________________
Tick Tick
ferocious is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ferocious For This Useful Post:
Sancho (09-07-2015)
Old 09-06-2015, 08:53 AM   #9
WankingWodger

Super Moderator
 
WankingWodger's Avatar
 
Join Date:
Dec 2006
Posts:
1,786
Shouts:
37
Thanks:
1,311

Rep Power:
WankingWodger is on a distinguished road
Default

The Aussies wouldn't know about fair play and etiquette of cricket if it came up and hit them with a cricket bat.

I suggest we put Bazza and Bagman in the middle of the Soi and then we throw cricket balls as hard as we can from 18 yards at them and see how they react.

They need to have a word with that fine upstanding sportsman Stuart Broad about sportsmanship.

__________________
AFKA ROLAND
WankingWodger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to WankingWodger For This Useful Post:
ferocious (09-06-2015), Frankie (09-06-2015)
Old 09-06-2015, 09:34 AM   #10
Fork Handles

Super Moderator
 
Fork Handles's Avatar
 
Join Date:
Dec 2006
Posts:
9,123
Shouts:
2520
Thanks:
3,385

Rep Power:
Fork Handles is on a distinguished road
Default

it wasn't the Aussies who asked for a review. Starc seemed unsure of what the rule was. Dharmasena called for a review. All of which gave Smith ample time to remember that it was only a one-day match and make a gesture that would have reset the tenor of future games.
__________________
Je suis Forky
Fork Handles is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump